Likelihood of increase in medical malpractice cap in Indiana
A Legislative study committee on September 10, 2015, contemplated the likelihood to increase the limit of recovery for a medical malpractice victim. The already existing medical malpractice cap has been fixed at $1.25 million (since 1999) with no amendment for more than 15 years. This issue was raised in an attempt to address the claims of malpractice victims in the present and existing time. Thus, under the currently existing medical malpractice laws liability of the insurer is limited to $250,000 and other damages in excess of that amount are paid from the Indiana Patient Compensation Fund, up to a total of $1.25 million.
A General Assembly Panel was set to study whether caps on damages in Indiana’s medical malpractice statute should be changed. The panel will likely hear presentation regarding caps on damages from the Department of Insurance before hearing from any groups in favor and in opposition to the changing of caps. House Bill 1043[1] introduced this year to increase the threshold of such caps cleared committees but was defeated in its houses of origin. The bill, authored by Republican Jerry Torr and co-authored by Republican Ryan Dvorak was put forward to explicitly increase the medical malpractice cap from $1,250,000 to $1,650,000 for claims arising after June 30, 2015. The said bill also detailed into other related issues and read that payments from the patient's compensation fund were to be disbursed not later than 60 days after the issuance of a final, non-appealable judgment.
On the other hand, those opposing such increase in the malpractice cap are concerned. Tim Kennedy, a lobbyist for Indiana Hospital Association is worried that such rise in the standard of damages will also increase the cost for doctors. Similar concerns were reflected by Mike Rinebold, Indiana State Medical Association lobbyist, according to whom, the rise will proportionally raise physician’s cost by approximately 15%, a figure also stated in the House Bill 1043.
The Assembly panel is still contemplating the issue and so far has not indicated if it would recommend increasing the medical malpractice cap.
[1] See “House Bill 1043” at: https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2015/bills/house/1043#digest-heading
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Do you really know what’s hurting your practice
If you’re among the 100’s of law practices who want to outsource in order to control their legal...
Blame the employee” defense rejected by 11th Circuit
The 11th circuit has made it very clear that an employer who knew that an employee was underreporting...
LGBT: Anti-Discrimination Bill to be introduced aiming to extend Civil Rights Protection
Over the period of years, the LGBTs (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) have made unsuccessful attempts to stand...
Identification of outsourceable tasks is important for law firms
Outsourcing is not new. It has always been a popular way of doing business all over the world....
