Pittsburgh’s Paid Sick Days Ordinance rejected by the Trial Court Judge
According to a Trial Court Judge’s ruling issued on December 21, 2015, the City of Pittsburgh no more possessed the authority to enact the Paid Sick Days Ordinance under the State Law.
While the Ordinance was passed by the Pittsburgh City Council on August 3, 2015, it was signed into law by Mayor Peduto on August 13, 2015.
Under the Paid Sick Days Ordinance, employers are required to provide paid sick leave to most employees working within the geographical boundaries of the City of Pittsburgh. The Ordinance enables employees to accrue one hour of paid sick time for every 35 hours worked for up to 40 hours of paid sick time for employers with 15 or more employees, and 24 hours of paid sick time for employers with fewer than 15 employees.
The Ordinance was initially scheduled to be effective on January 11, 2016.
However, it was challenged by the Pennsylvania Restaurant & Lodging Association and various other businesses operating in the City. They argued that the City of Pittsburgh is a home rule charter municipality governed by state law which restricted the City’s authority to enact any ordinance determining any duty, responsibility, or requirement of a business or private employer.
Further, the City of Pittsburgh had argued that state law permits cities to pass ordinances relating to disease prevention and control, whereas, trial court noted that the provision of state law upon which the City relied were only applicable to municipalities who had boards of health or a department of health. Pittsburgh had neither. As a result, the Judge dissented with the City’s argument that it was empowered to adopt the ordinance by the Disease Prevention and Control Law.
The court acknowledged with the Pennsylvania Restaurant & Lodging Association and based on an earlier decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that the Paid Sick Days Act imposed a requirement on employers, the Trial Court ruled that the Paid Sick Leave Ordinance was invalid and unenforceable. As a result, employers weren’t under any legal obligation to provide any paid sick time for employees working in the City of Pittsburgh.
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Vallejo Park sued for wrongful termination
Lawsuit alleging Vallejo Park for wrongful termination was filed by the two former employees of the Six Flags...
Federal Circuit’s Decision on Nexus between Challenged Claims and the Commercial Products
On August 16, 2021, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a patent trial and...
Green a Thon at Draft N Craft We have Done Our Bit Now Its Your Turn
‘The grass would be greener on your side’” is how Draft n Craft celebrated the Green Week.The firm...
Changing Roles and Increasing Importance of Legal Support Staff
Paralegals, legal assistants and legal secretaries are collectively known as legal support staff in law firms. They work...
