Unusual Marital Property for Division in Divorce
Usually, when a couple moves towards divorce or separation there come a few hassles related to the division of marital property. In general parlance, states use a set of rules called “equitable distribution” to divide a couple’s assets. Although, the distribution of the marital asset is done on fifty-fifty basis and each state has its own unique rules governing the allocation of assets during the divorce process which may vary significantly.
The concern comes when marital property includes some unusual assets which are hard to decide upon. These assets are those which fall in to a questionable category. Usually, anything that was acquired during the marriage may be considered marital property and thus a divorce asset.
Few of such odd assets or marital properties often include family pets, an interest over the earning of the spouse, life insurance, patents or copyrights or royalties over copyright, pending bonuses, damages obtained in personal injury lawsuit, travel rewards, lottery tickets, tax refunds etc. are considered to be divisible asset sometimes. Few such assets are mentioned below:
Security Deposit: When the parties make a security deposit upon leased property during the marriage, the right to return of that deposit when the lease ends is marital property.
Bonds & Mutual Funds: Bonds and mutual funds are generally treated as divisible assets, similar to investment stock.
Degrees and Licenses: Academic literature has long debated the proper classification of degrees and licenses; however the case law is relatively clear. In Michigan and New York by case law, and in Oregon by statute, degrees and licenses is divisible property. In all other states, they are not divisible property. Although, contributions to degrees and licenses are still a valid basis for an unequal division of other assets, however, and where divorce occurs shortly after completion of the degree or license, most states will award the contributing spouse some form of reimbursement alimony.
Dissipated Assets: Assets that were not owned at the time of divorce, but were dissipated in anticipation of the marital breakdown, can be treated as marital property and awarded to the spouse who dissipated them.
Likewise, there may be other such odd marital property which seeks contemplation over its division between the spouses during divorce.
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
LPO Services for Law Firms: Complete Guide to Smarter Legal Support
Why Leading Legal Outsourcing Firms in the USA Are Changing the Game From Wall Street Giants to Main...
J&J appeal of $140 million judgment denied by the U.S. Supreme Court
On January 19th, the U.S. Supreme Court denied to hear Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) appeal of a $140...
Massachusetts Hospital slammed with endoscopy infection lawsuits
Recently, the Baystate Noble Hospital in Westfield, Massachusetts has been accused in an endoscope lawsuit for putting patient’s...
Morgan Stanley profit drops on legal expenses
By Tim Mullaney | USA TODAY | 17 Jan 2014 at 10:47 AM Morgan Stanley said fourth-quarter profit dropped sharply...
