Ohio man sues hospital and doctor for daughter’s death
A medical malpractice case against Cabell Huntington Hospital and Dr. Carolyn Clark has been filed in the Cabell Circuit Court.
Aspen Smith, a baby girl, was born to parents Robert and Chastity Smith at the Cabell Huntington Hospital on June 23, 2014. On June 24, just a few hours after her birth, she was declared dead.
Chastity was admitted in the hospital on June 23, to be induced to give birth to their daughter. As per the complaint, Dr. Clark had placed an intrauterine pressure catheter on her and noticed some bloody amniotic fluid in the face of increased resting tone, which indicated a clear sign of placental abruption. Within twenty minutes of this, fetal bradycardia was documented and the fetal heart rate readings were classified as a Category 3 under the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring protocol. According to ACOG, this is an abnormal state requiring prompt evaluation. Such a reading may require providing oxygen to the pregnant woman, changing the woman’s position, discontinuing labor stimulation, or treating maternal hypotension, among other things. If the tracings do not return to normal, the fetus should be delivered.[1]
It is alleged that Dr. Clark did not call for a caesarean delivery in time, due to which Aspen was born with severe neurological deficits, metabolic acidosis and no spontaneous respirations. She was diagnosed to be suffering from a medical condition i.e., perinatal asphyxia or deprivation of oxygen. She could not survive and was pronounced dead late night.
The parents allege that Dr. Clark knew or should have known the after effects and precautionary measures to be taken, given the circumstances Chasity was in and had experienced. Dr. Clark as well as the nurses at Cabell breached their duty and deviated from the standard of care by failing to closely evaluate Chasity and Aspen’s condition. They also failed to timely deliver Aspen causing severe medical conditions.
Robert Smith is seeking compensatory and punitive damages from the defendants. The case has been assigned to Circuit Judge F. Jane Hustead.
[1] See “ACOG Refines Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Guidelines” at: http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2009/ACOG-Refines-Fetal-Heart-Rate-Monitoring-Guidelines
Related Content
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Texas and New Hampshire Add to the Ranks: Proposing Comprehensive Data Privacy Bills for Enhanced Protection
In addition to the existing states such as California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas,...
Draft n Craft Announces First Webinar in Legal Innovation Series: Virtualization of Law Firms – Trends to Stay
NEW YORK CITY, UNITED STATES, March 4, 2024 – Draft n Craft, a leading provider of virtual legal...
Crisis Navigator: Weathering Storms with Dedicated Remote Paralegal (DRP) from Draft n Craft
During the COVID-19 pandemic, firms with established remote work infrastructure transitioned seamlessly, ensuring uninterrupted service for clients. Remote...
