Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act
The class action device is a necessary and an important part of the US legal system. It promotes efficiency by allowing plaintiffs with similar claims to adjudicate their cases fairly in one proceeding. It allows claims to be heard in cases in which there are small harms to a large number of people that would otherwise go unaddressed because the cost for an individual plaintiff to sue would far exceed the benefits. In February, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing to examine the state of class action litigation and current concerns. On April 22, 2015, the Committee’s Chairman Bob Goodlatte introduced the Bill, H.R. 1927, “The Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2015”, which seeks to further improve the fairness of class actions by imposing limits on a court’s ability to certify classes in which members have not suffered the same types of alleged injury/damages.
The Bill aims to reform the existing federal class action lawsuit framework and needs to ensure that the classes in class action litigation are of a similar nature with regards to the injury and its extent. The press release for introducing the Bill announced that it purports “to strengthen federal class action lawsuit rules by ensuring victims who have experienced actual or comparable injury are justly compensated.” [1]
The press release of the Committee indicated that under the proposed legislation, uninjured or non-comparably injured parties can still join class actions, but must do so separately from the parties that experienced the more extensive injury.
In introducing the Bill, Chairman Goodlatte stated:[2]
“The Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act is a simple, one-page bill that furthers a common sense principle that should apply to class action lawsuits in the future. Only those people who share injuries of the same type and extent should be part of a class action lawsuit”;
while Civil Justice Subcommittee Chairman Trent Franks opined that:
“Class action lawsuits should allow those with serious injuries to have their own day in court. The Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act would do just that.”
The Bill intends to strike a balance between the plaintiff(s) and defendants(s) as it would be integral in improving the civil justice system in the United States. Moreover, since abusive class action practices still exist today, there is a further need to improve the system so as to ensure that class action lawsuits are fair and impartial.
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Power morcellation regarded as most dangerous medical procedures
In Davis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:2016-cv-00101, Dr. Amy Reed, 42, an anesthesiologist and mother...
Why do people hire Contract Drafting Support Services?
Legal contract writing is an important stage in legally binding two parties so that their commercial and professional...
Attorneys unavailable to take up medical malpractice cases
Jennifer Eastman, went to a hospital to get a dead fetus removed from her uterus. The doctor who...
‘Lazy’ lawyers have right ideas for LPO
Andrew Jennnings | Lawyers Weekly Law firms should look to the “smart, lazy” lawyers within their organisation rather...
