Blame the employee” defense rejected by 11th Circuit
The 11th circuit has made it very clear that an employer who knew that an employee was underreporting their works hours cannot escape liability under the Fair Labor Standards Act claim.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires employers to pay their employees for overtime. If an employer knew its employee underreported his hours, it cannot still assert equitable defenses based on the employee’s own conduct in underreporting as a total bar to the employee’s Fair Labor Standards Act claim.
Santonias Bailey was an employee of TitleMax, Georgia. He worked overtime hours for which he was not paid. At the direction of his supervisor, who told him that TitleMax did not pay overtime, he regularly worked off the clock. The same supervisor also repeatedly edited Mr. Bailey’s time records to report fewer hours than he actually worked. Bailey eventually brought a lawsuit suit against TitleMax under the FLSA, which requires employers to pay their employees for overtime.
TitleMax argued and put the blame of unpaid overtime on Bailey. TitleMax insisted that Bailey was responsible for any unpaid overtime, because he could have complained about his supervisor, but he did not. Further, the company claimed that Bailey did not follow TitleMax’s policies for ensuring accurate time records. While the District Court agreed with the employer’s argument, the 11th circuit rejected it and reversed the summary judgment granted in favor of TitleMax.
The court held that in an employee’s unpaid overtime suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), where he underreported hours by working off the clock and his supervisor changed his time records to decrease the number of hours he reported, his claim survived because he worked overtime without pay and the employer knew or should have known he worked overtime. Further, the unclean hands and in pari delicto defenses did not bar the employee’s FLSA claim, because the supervisor’s knowledge could be imputed to the employer, making it liable for the FLSA violation, since an employer cannot invoke equitable defenses based on underreporting to bar an employee’s FLSA claim where the employer knew or had reason to know that its employee underreported his hours.
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Remarkable Addition to California Employment Laws in 2015
The California Legislature was unusually active in last year sessions’ 2014. California Governor Jerry Brown signed numerous bills...
U.S. Legal System Ranked as Most Costly
By Shannon Green |Corporate Counsel | May 17, 2013 The U.S. legal system is the world’s most costly,...
Connecting the Dots: Carrying Costs, Outsourcing, Contract Lawyers and Working from Home
Written By Timothy B. Corcoran on FEBRUARY 28, 2013 | Corcorn’s Business of Law Within hours of publishing...
The Steeple Chase Race for Law Firms
We have been talking about the ABS and its effects on to the legal industry at large for...
