Amended complaint with racketeering claim filed in class action lawsuit against General Motors
A class action lawsuit filed last year against the General Motors Company (GM) on account of their faulty ignition switches, was amended with an added complaint of racketeering on June 10, 2015. The plaintiffs are accusing GM for working with a law firm and claims-management company to conceal an ignition-switch defect linked to 114 deaths. Attorneys Hagens Berman and Lieff Cabraser representing plaintiffs filed this expanded class-action complaint bringing RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) claims in the Manhattan Federal Court. The existing lawsuit consolidated more than 200 separate claims against GM over injuries, deaths and economic losses due to faulty ignition switches. These newly filed accusations are based upon the information revealed during the discovery phase of the ongoing lawsuit. The information shows that GM committed mail and wire fraud in connection with the ignition switch defect that causes cars to stall unexpectedly and disables the airbags.
The complaint also tends to propose certification of a class who owned or leased the company’s car from 2009 to 2014, through which the company remained bankrupt, as well as those who purchased from post-bankruptcy “New GM”. The complaint was revised based on the bankruptcy judge’s April ruling that barred claims related to the pre-bankruptcy conduct of “Old GM.” More than 20 million vehicle owners and about $10 billion in damages are included in the amended complaint.
The amended lawsuit claims fraud and violation of racketeering laws by covering up the ignition-switch defect committed by GM. It further accuses GM, law firm King & Spalding and claims-management company ESIS for concealing their knowledge about the defect and hiding it from private litigants and the public. King & Spalding and ESIS are however not the named defendants.
According to the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Steve Berman, the amended complaint “focuses solely on New GM’s misconduct” to comply with the bankruptcy court’s decision, which plaintiffs plan to appeal.
Approximately 2.6 million vehicles have been recalled by GM over the defective switch. GM has paid $35 million fine over its delayed response to the defect on a federal criminal probe. Further, the company’s compensation fund has paid claims for 114 deaths and 229 injuries, as an out-of-court settlement.
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Outsourcing Worries Australian InHouse Counsel
Posted by law fuel editors, on Jan 26 Outsourcing’ may be a buzz word among law firm managers,...
Secured Creditors and Several Proof of Claim Options
Under the Bankruptcy Code, a secured creditor has varied choices in terms of how to file a proof...
ABS – Alternative Business Structures or Additional Business Stress
Introduction of ABS in the market has added stress and competition to the already recession affected legal industry....