Supreme Court Agrees to Reconsider Automotive Dealership Service Advisors’ Exempt Status under FLSA
The retail automotive dealerships enjoy a special exemption for overtime under Section 13(b)(10)(A) of the FLSA. DOL has taken different stands over the years, with regard to the exempt status of automobile dealership service advisors, and the like that are not specifically listed in the statute. These include finance and insurance sales, paint and body shop employees, and service advisors.
The statute provides an overtime exemption for “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles, trucks, or farm implements….” 29 U.S. Code § 213 (b)(10)(A).
The service advisors are regarded as the liaisons between customers and mechanics. They provide for services like estimates, arrange for loaner cars and resolve problems with repairs or delays in repairs.
The DOL through its opinion letter indicated that the service advisors are not qualified to meet the exemption under section 13(b)(10)(A), to which the Federal courts have disagreed to. [See Opinion Letters – Fair Labor Standards Act, FLSA2008-10NA, June 9, 2008][1]
However, in Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, LLC, 780 F.3d 1267 (2015), the Ninth Circuit held that the service advisors, who evaluated car repair needs and solicited supplemental repair services, were not exempt from the FLSA overtime requirements because they did not sell cars, stock parts, or perform mechanical work on cars.
This January 15th, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider whether customer service workers at auto dealerships are exempt from the overtime protections in federal labor law in order to resolve the circuit court split and provide guidance on the scope of the automotive industry overtime exemption. Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, No. 15-415, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 635.
Even though the decision could limit its application to service advisors, a broad reading of the statutory exemption could propel the dealerships to extend the exemption status to other related occupations.
The exemptions under Section 13(b)(10)(A) only applies to overtime and not to the minimum wage. The dealerships would be required to maintain accurate records of hours worked to assure that minimum wages are paid until the service advisors do not fall within another FLSA exemption.
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Montana refuses to follow other states following religious discrimination
House Bill 615 dealing in religious based discrimination laws could not be passed by the Montana House, as...
Top Bizarre cases of 2014 – Believe It or Not!
Little League Coach sued a player for $500,000 over a Celebratory Helmet Toss alleging that the helmet tore...
ESSENTIAL QUALITIES OF A LAWYER TO BE A PART OF LPO
Lawyers represented that part of the society which was considered intelligent and aware of legislations and capable to...
No Relaxation for Delaying Debtor Rent Obligations Beyond 60-Day Statutory Period
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas recently granted abatement motions in the hospitality and...
