Lawsuit against JBS for unequal opportunity based on religion
JBS USA (“JBS”), a Greeley-based meatpacking company, was alleged to have been practicing discrimination against Muslim Employees in a federal court and has now headed towards a trial.
The case dates back to 2008, wherein the Somali Muslim Employees were terminated when they requested for breaks for their prayer during the Ramadan month, [see EEOC & Ors. v. JBS, USA, LLC, Civil Action No. 10-cv – 02103- PAB-KLM (2008)].
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2010 had filed two discrimination lawsuits against the company – one in Colorado and another in Nebraska which was decided in favor of the company.
According to EEOC, JBS’ behavior was in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, that prohibited discrimination on the basis of religion and also required it’s employers to make reasonable accommodation for their employees’ religious beliefs and practices unless the company went through any hardships.
JBS claimed that the 2008 termination was a one-time event and it did not represent a wider pattern of religious discrimination and since then various steps had been taken by the company’s representatives such as accommodation for Muslim employees, provisions for prayer rooms in the Greeley facility, offered with the choice of switching shifts and allowing employees to pray before or after their shifts and during scheduled breaks. JBS’ spokesman Cameron Bruett was of the opinion:
“We believe we treat all our employees equally irrespective of their religious affiliation their race, their race, their gender”.
He further stated that since the 2008 termination, the company did not have any disruptions at the workplace during the period of Ramadan.
However, EEOC contended that the steps taken by the company were not enough and thus wanted the company to rearrange a break time which coincided with the prayer time and also allowing the Muslim employees to leave their posts for 10-15 minutes at their specific prayer time, which was to be considered as an unscheduled break.
Since the request for summary judgment by JBS was denied by the Colorado U.S. District Judge Philip Brimmer, further trials would be conducted involving arguments by both the parties within 4-6 weeks.[1]
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Discrimination Lawsuits against Disney
For the past few years, Walt Disney World (“Disney”) has been fighting several lawsuits alleging harassment and unfair...
Do Attorneys have Time for Festivals
New York, NY(1888PressRelease) December 10, 2011 Festivals are the time when the warmth of togetherness and companionship wraps...
Northern District Court, Ohio Denies to Exercise Specific Personal Jurisdiction in FLSA Collective Action Suit
In a recent judgment, the United States District Court Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division passed an interesting...
Hire A Dedicated Remote Employee (DRE) – Attorney/Paralegal for your Law Firm or In-House Legal Department
A mid-sized law firm’s Partner whose law firm was into personal injury, medical malpractice, workers’ compensation, and product...
