Lenox Corp. Sues its Ex- General Counsel
Interestingly, table wear manufacturer Lenox Corp. of Bristol, Pennsylvania has sued its former general counsel William Robedee at the Federal Court, Newark on March 5, 2015, claiming that Robedee took up a job with its competitor Company Nambe LLC, while negotiating to acquire the Nambe as Lenox’s representative. See Lenox Corporation v. William J. Robedee and Louis Scala, 3:2015cv01654 (2015).[1]
The issue came up post notification by Nambe to end the acquisition negotiations on August 25, 2014, when not much later on September 12, 2014, Nambe announced Robedee’s taking charge as the President and Chief Executive Officer for Nambe. Lenox subsequently brought a claim of unfair competition, civil conspiracy and breach of duty against Robedee along with Louis Scala, who was also employed by Lenox earlier as the Senior Vice President, but later joined Nambe. Lenox alleged that Robedee breached his duty of loyalty by putting up his own personal interest above that of his client and employer. The company also alleged that in the process of its employment with Lenox, Robedee has obtained confidential information about the company and has taken undue advantage of it- more particularly the information passed on during the ongoing acquisition negotiations between the two companies. Also, in and around August 2014, Nambe sent certain financial documents to Lenox, which was retained by Robedee. He further used those documents to persuade Nambe to take its business off for sale and in the process hire him and Scala to improve its business value before selling the same. The suit seeks unspecified compensatory damages and return of company’s confidential information.
Robedee retaliated by stating the lawsuit as frivolous and labeled it as an “underhanded bullying tactics and employee retention by intimidation”. He further stated that every in-house counsel obtains confidential information about their employer but such obtainment or possession shall not intend to stop him seeking a new job. He expressed his anger towards Lenox in stating that in order to retain prominent employees, companies usually incentivize them. On the whole, this seems to be an interesting case that is likely to come up with more hidden facts.
[1] See Case documents at: http://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-jersey/njdce/3:2015cv01654/316074
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
Fancy proposal to hike minimum wage up to $15 for fast food restaurant employees: New York
Much of the debate is made over the raise of minimum wage up to $15 per hour for...
Partners axed, revenue growth sluggish at large UK firms
Julius Melnitzer | Oct 1, 2012 1:24 PM ET | FINANCIAL POST Legalweek.com reports that the UK`s 100 largest law...
Littler Mendelson’s Barbara Hoey will be speaking at Draft n Craft’s upcoming conference in New York
Draft n Craft is pleased to announce Barbara E. Hoey, shareholder at Littler Mendelson as a speaker for...
The GCs have spoken. Are you listening?
Legal Water Cooler Blog |By Heather Morse | 25th Oct 2013 I’ve been working on the business side...
