Construction Contractors under Fair Chance Employment Act
In California, Governor Jerry Brown signed the Assembly Bill 1650, the Fair Chance Employment Act, authored by Assembly member Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer last year. The new law took effect on January 1, 2015. As per the new law, State contractors may not ask about conviction history in initial hiring process of construction workers. This will decrease the impediments for ex-offenders to obtain employment by requiring private contractors who have state contracts to remove the conviction history box from job applications.
This policy only applies to on-site construction related jobs that fall under the State Contract Act which includes the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any state structure, building, road, or improvement project. Any person submitting a bid to the state on a contract involving onsite construction-related services shall certify that the person will not ask an applicant for onsite construction-related employment to disclose orally or in writing information concerning the conviction history of the applicant on or at the time of an initial employment application. This Act requires some employers to “ban the box” that talks about convictions from their employment applications.
The law attempts to address three major issues –
1) Discriminatory employment practices for individuals with prior criminal convictions
2) Extremely high unemployment rates for individuals with criminal backgrounds
3) High recidivism rates within California.
Technically, it does not prohibit or otherwise limit a state contractor who employs on-site construction-related employees from conducting a criminal background check. But the legislative analysis specifically notes that employers should continue to approach these decisions with care to avoid violating employment discrimination laws, which require that job requirements be justified when they fall more heavily on some groups. The new law does not affect the existing law requiring that employment standards be related to the job.
Men and women released from prison often face obstacles as they return home to their communities, however none can be more difficult than finding employment. Thus, removing the conviction history box can give thousands of individuals a fair shot at employment while simultaneously decreasing the recidivism rate, increasing economic activity and improving public safety.
Related Content
Indo-US Legal Sector Redefined: Consulate General of India, New York, SEPC India, and Draft n Craft Join Forces.
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, June 29, 2023-The Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference, a groundbreaking event aimed at fostering...
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States
Indo-US Legal Sector – Redefining Relationships Conference to Unite Legal Professionals from India and the United States This...
Importance of Medical Records Summaries in Mass Tort Litigation
Mass torts cases are complex and often involve multiple plaintiffs who have suffered harm from the same product...
Care Plus and its Entities Agree to Pay $7.2 Million Against Anti-Kickback Allegations
On April 13, 2022, Care Plus Management, LLC (“Care Plus”), its founders Paul D. Weir and John R....
Copper Creek (Marysville) | Washington Court of Appeals on Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Statute of Limitations
On April 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 granted the motion for reconsideration and...
Federal District Court, California Dismisses Class Action Suit for Lack of Specific Jurisdiction
On April 01, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled in dismissal of...
Southern District of Florida Grants Motion to Dismiss in Mass Class Action
On April 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has granted motion...
First Department Ordered New Trial in Personal Injury Damages Lawsuit
On March 29, 2022, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided in Miller v. Camelot Communications Group, Inc., 2022...
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules out Product Liability due to Third Party’s Wrongful Behavior
The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 2022, decided in Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case that a...
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA): Employers fate to be decided in 2022
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court announced to review the most consequential PAGA case Viking...
New Jersey Lawmakers Advance Bill To Allow Pandemic Insurance
A New Jersey Assembly committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit insurers to offer coverage to policyholders...
Tech groups criticize Florida’s social media law as Unconstitutional.
Tech groups criticize Florida's social media law as unconstitutional.
New York ‘HERO’ Act requires employers to establish airborne infectious disease safety protocols.
The New York HERO Act (S.1034-B/A.2681-B), a critical bill requiring businesses to have enforceable safety standards to prevent...
Cost-padding, profit shedding law firms! Are you one of them?
Cost padding happens when a business deliberately inflates its costs than what it has incurred and then passes...
New Guidelines to affect LPO in Australia
By Deepti Krishnan, Analyst, ValueNotes Sourcing Practice|Posted on 22 January 2013 Australia is an emerging destination for Legal...
How ABA Rule Changes Are Shaping the Future of Legal Process Outsourcing?
Legal outsourcing has revolutionized the legal industry, offering law firms and legal departments a strategic advantage in today’s...
From Tragedy to Transformation: How Medical Malpractice Cases Underscore the Need for Expert Legal Support
Medical malpractice cases not only bring to light the vulnerabilities within our healthcare system but also emphasize the...
North Carolina District Court Dismisses Filters Fast’s Motion to Dismiss Against Proposed Data Breach Class Action
On July 19, 2021, the United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina dismissed Filters Fast LLC’s...
